Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54742 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2002 22:22:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54731 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2002 22:22:32 -0000 Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 14:22:38 -0800 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Emacs stanza? Message-ID: <20020106222238.GV14870@ebuilt.com> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <20020102165006.A3520@Lithium.MeepZor.Com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020102165006.A3520@Lithium.MeepZor.Com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:50:06PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > I don't know how many people use Emacs to edit the Apache stuff, > but would anyone object to a stanza at the bottom of the source > files to help put Emacs in the right stylistic mood? To wit, > something like: I don't know if this got purposely resent on the 6th, but I'll chime in now and say that I think this isn't a good idea at all. I think you should be able to configure your editor yourself. =) However, if you *must* do this (I don't think you should at all, but I'll stop short of a veto), I'd think it'd be a better idea to follow SVN's convention by adding this to all files: /* ----------------------------------------------------------------- * local variables: * eval: (load-file "../emacs-style") * end: */ Where ../emacs-style is obviously the relative path to emacs-style. This way we can change the global style by just modifying emacs-style rather than all files. And, it allows some useful macros in emacs-style. FWIW, I don't use emacs... Go vi. =) -- justin