Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5878 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2002 22:13:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5865 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2002 22:13:05 -0000 From: "Victor J. Orlikowski" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15436.37493.779536.191963@critterling.garfield.home> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:13:09 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Tagging 1.3.23 In-Reply-To: <20020121231001.D49128@io.stderr.net> References: <005601c1a2b0$7eb43e50$06000100@sashimi> <009001c1a2b2$6eb55320$06000100@sashimi> <3C4C75BB.65D6834D@Golux.Com> <15436.31570.267455.807403@critterling.garfield.home> <3C4C7FCB.667DA475@Golux.Com> <15436.33753.533340.999421@critterling.garfield.home> <20020121224706.B49128@io.stderr.net> <3C4C9051.E68448AD@Golux.Com> <20020121231001.D49128@io.stderr.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under Emacs 21.1.1 Reply-To: vjo@dulug.duke.edu X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I still think that there has to be a better way, rather than patching find-dbm-lib right and left based on wherever a vendor decided to put their ndbm.h. If no-one beats me to it, I'll prolly muck with this tonight. Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski | The Wall is Down, But the Threat Remains! ================================================================== orlikowski@apache.org | vjo@dulug.duke.edu | vjo@us.ibm.com