Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87517 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2002 16:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87505 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 16:01:50 -0000 Message-ID: <012f01c199f0$5b7aa690$a5381b09@sashimi> From: "Bill Stoddard" To: References: <20020109194703.90224.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <20020109133801.B1365@waka.ebuilt.net> <01c201c19958$25dda8e0$a5381b09@sashimi> <3C3D88CA.B922C90E@Golux.Com> <3C3DBBD4.A237B0FC@Golux.Com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_core.c Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:03:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N My opinion is 2. With a note in CHANGES about which structure changed and how it changed. Bill > So.. should this be changed to > > 1. no MMN bump, > 2. a minor MMN bump, > 3. a major MMN bump, or > 4. reverted right out of 1.3? > > I'm personally cool with any except #4.. > -- > #ken P-)} > > Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ > Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ > > "All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!" >