Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 70470 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2002 13:27:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 70457 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 13:27:55 -0000 Message-ID: <001e01c1a412$06b3fc70$8a381b09@sashimi> From: "Bill Stoddard" To: References: <05ad01c1a3d9$1bb10020$94c0b0d0@v505> Subject: Re: APACHE_1_3_23... Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 08:29:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Humm... Okay, what undocumented step did I miss in tagging the release? I checked out apache-1.3 and tagged it. What was missed?? Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:36 AM Subject: APACHE_1_3_23... > ...is broken, due to httpd-docs-1.3 missing that tag. > > Mr. RM, could you fix? > > Bill >