httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: Tag 1.3.23?
Date Tue, 15 Jan 2002 21:55:28 GMT
+1 on committing this code ASAP.

Bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Murcko" <chuck@topsail.org>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: Tag 1.3.23?


> May I suggest we once and for all put the HTTP 1.1 mod_proxy in after 
> letting testers@ beat on it?
> 
> It is binary compatible changes (slightly ugly because of the way we 
> define the opaque table interface in alloc.c) but is a big improvement 
> over the old proxy. The only core code touch is removal of the denial of 
> HTTP 1.1 responses in the core.
> 
> I have run it here for years now 8^) so I know it is not fundamentally 
> flawed.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 12:14 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> 
> > I am reasonable sure the problem we are seeing with Windows XP is not a 
> > bug in Apache. I
> > suspect a buggy layered service provider interacting badly with the 
> > Windows
> > DuplicateSocket call.
> >
> > Anyway... anyone object to tagging 1.3.23 (sans any changes that will 
> > require a major MMN
> > bump)?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> Chuck Murcko
> Topsail Group
> http://www.topsail.org/
> 


Mime
View raw message