httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: Tagging .31 soon
Date Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:30:10 GMT
FWIW, I am not opposed to Ian tagging the 2.0 tree for his purposes.

Bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@covalent.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: Tagging .31 soon


> From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:29 AM
> 
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:08:48AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > > probably tomorrow if no major problems/objections occur.
> > 
> > Can we please wait until Monday?  I'd like to do the following
> > things:
> > 
> > - Remove mod_auth_db
> > - Check in ap_rgetline rewrite (Ryan Morgan's had the only comment so
> >   far)
> > - Change the ap_get_brigade prototype once more to remove *readbytes
> 
> From: "Ian Holsman" <ianh@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:50 AM
> %
> 
> % no offense justin,
> % but I'd like to Tag BEFORE these patches go in. they have the possibilty
> % of de-stablising the entire tree, which would could shoot the friday/monday.
> 
> I very much disagree.  DO NOT FOIST AN API WE INTEND TO CHANGE ONTO 
> DEVELOPERS.  If we are going to break the API, we break it.  But no fair 
> releasing when we know _exactly_ what the changes are.
> 
> > I also know Aaron is intending to look at the shmem code in the 
> > next few days to resolve his hack he checked in last night.
> 
> And I have about three things or so to drop into .31
> 
>  - fix Win32 scoreboard fault [unnamed malloc-style fallback case]
>  - fix Win32 anon shm allocation [converse of Aarons' headaches :-]
>  - fix apr_dup2's prototype [goes to what I screamed above]
> 
> Of course, fix the "Win32 is broke" bug
> 
> > FWIW, if you don't intend on releasing .31 - which *I* won't
> > vote for without these changes, then you can simply tag it as
> > iholsman_cool_tag or some other nonsense.  Apparently, rumour
> > has it that this is what we used to do in the 1.3 series.  -- justin
> 
> No, I'll veto release on the points we raised above - wait for Monday
> and save the tag.
> 


Mime
View raw message