httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: Tagging 1.3.23
Date Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:52:40 GMT
The tarball hasn't been rolled, so if the change is simple, why not make the change and
bump the tag?  This method has worked pretty good for 2.0 if we impose a reasonable time
limit between the tag and the roll (say 24 hours).

Bill (who really doesn't mind if we go to 1.3.24)

> I have a feeling that this implies a 1.3.24... The real fix is
> to include the correct header, or determine if it's even
> needed.
>
> Thomas Eibner wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:53:31PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > > "Victor J. Orlikowski" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Argh!!!!
> > > > Not this *again*.
> > > > *Sigh*.
> > > > Which linux distribution?
> > >
> > > RH 7.1.  This was building for 1.3.22, so I'm pretty sure
> > > this is something new.
> >
> > I just tried it on my debian, with the ndbm.h symbolic link it works,
> > without it breaks. So I'd say it's a linux problem. It's been happening
> > to me for ages on my new debian boxen until I did the link from gdbm-ndbm.h
> >
> > --
> >   Thomas Eibner <http://thomas.eibner.dk/> DnsZone <http://dnszone.org/>
> >   mod_pointer <http://stderr.net/mod_pointer>
> >
>
>
> --
> ===========================================================================
>    Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
>       "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
>                    will lose both and deserve neither"
>


Mime
View raw message