httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: APACHE_1_3_23...
Date Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:19:03 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@covalent.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: APACHE_1_3_23...


> From: "Bill Stoddard" <bill@wstoddard.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:29 AM
>
>
> > Humm...
> > Okay, what undocumented step did I miss in tagging the release?  I checked out
apache-1.3
> > and tagged it. What was missed??
>
> Did you do _anything_ else?  What flags [buried in .cvsrc, as well] did you use?
> Which version of CVS were you using [for all to be cautious of]?
>
> htdocs is _very_ fragile, it's why our model was broken since the split.
>
> Either the htdocs -repository- must be folded back to its old home in
> apache-1.3, or the apache-1.3/htdocs directory must be rm -rf'ed from cvs!
>
> By blasting htdocs out of apache-1.3, the system will no longer checkout,
> and immediately prune that tree on update with "No Longer in the Repository"
> emits.  It will check the files out from the sub-module, and _leave_them_.
>
> Bill

The only breakage I saw was with src/.cvsignore. The tag log did not indicate any other
errors.  However, the htdocs directory was NOT populated by a simple cvs co apache-1.3.
That's why no tags in the docco.

Bill


Mime
View raw message