Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 63179 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2001 00:02:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 63168 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2001 00:02:25 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:02:28 -0800 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: StartServers > MaxSpareServers (or MaxSpareThreads) Message-ID: <20011212160227.A1529@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@httpd.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Should we issue a warning if this happens and push StartServers back down to the MaxSpareServers (or a function of MaxSpareThreads) limit? Would an admin ever really want to do that? -aaron