Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88711 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2001 08:53:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88700 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2001 08:53:57 -0000 Message-ID: From: GOMEZ Henri To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: Reporting on Patches of FreeBSD ports (fwd) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:54:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:58:49PM +0100, GOMEZ Henri wrote: >> - It could be fine also to add --with-ssl-port > >I'd rather see them set the SSL port manually, but that's >me. Other people? the idea is primary for packaging but make sense since therfe is a --with-port. Just to be consistent. >> - config_vars.mk is installed under $prefix/build >> whereas I'd like to put it on /usr/lib/apache2 >> (which could be libexecdir). >> apxs could be extended to report config_vars.mk >> path via a query like : apxs -q CONFIG_VARS.MK > >Why? It is strictly a build thing (i.e. it is a >Makefile fragment). Yes, but mod_jk/mod_webapp include it in all their makefile and cause me problems. Question, should we include config_vars.mk in a module build Makefile ? >> I'm +1000 with httpd installed on sbindir instead >> of bindir, which is a general policy for unix daemons. > >AFAICT, httpd is installed to the sbindir - just that >the default layout has sbindir == bindir. =) Yes, but the apachectl is using HTTPD='@prefix@/bin/@progname@' instead of HTTPD='@sbindir@/@progname@' Also in apachectl, @prefix@/logs/@progname@.pid, instead of @runtimedir@@progname@.pid as it was it Apache 1.3. Fortunatly these should be easy to fix :) >I think the biggest complaint so far is that we don't >have --with-layout support. Any volunteers? > >If you guys are building packages, please just submit >your patches that you applied to the tree in as clean >a manner as possible. We can wade through them (much >like what we did with Daniel's Debian patches). -- justin Sent :)