Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 79060 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2001 15:16:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 79049 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2001 15:16:14 -0000 Sender: gregames@Mail.MeepZor.Com Message-ID: <3BEBF301.E8733486@remulak.net> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 10:15:13 -0500 From: Greg Ames X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-10mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: httpd Subject: Re: 2.0.28 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Cliff Woolley wrote: > > I did some testing on 2.0.28: > > Can you bump the tag on httpd.conf to get the revert of that BeOS IfModule > thing of David's (very important)? done. > Can you also bump the tag on > mod_headers.c to include the fix for the (new within the last day) > constness compiler warning I just committed (not critical)? normally I would resist sliding in something that's not that important. But you went way beyond the call of duty with your testing of the preliminary tarball, not to mention recently slaying the dragon of BSD/OS make, so I bumped this one too. Greg