Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66681 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2001 16:18:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66670 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2001 16:18:18 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:18:12 -0800 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Some patches to start supporting AS/400 (iSeries) Message-ID: <20011119081812.J18738@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <000701c170f3$3fb9ce70$56011fac@pc0082> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000701c170f3$3fb9ce70$56011fac@pc0082> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:10:58PM +0100, Gomez Henri wrote: > Ok, I understand, but do you means I'll have to subscribe > directly to dev@httpd.apache.org in order to propose > some patches ? Nope, just put your name on the email so we know who the contributor is. :) > It make sense to follow dev@httpd.apache.org when you're > a regular developper and contributor (commiter), but I don't > fit in that category today and really have concern on reducing > the number of emails I could reasonnabily handle each days. > > But if it's mandatory, not problem, I'll subscribe to dev list.... As long as you can participate in the discussion about your own patches, that is probably enough. -aaron