Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:13:20 -0800
From: Aaron Bannert <aaron@clove.org>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.0.28-beta release?
Message-ID: <20011113111320.K7138@clove.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert <aaron@clove.org>, dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <20011113102823.M855@ebuilt.com> <3BF16CE2.AB916EC7@remulak.net>
 <3BF16F1B.63EDA4EA@remulak.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3BF16F1B.63EDA4EA@remulak.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:06:03PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
> crap...  I just looked at viewcvs.  There's been two other changes to
> that file since the tag, one of which probably hit multiple files.  It's
> starting too sound risky to pull in the patch.
> 
> Why don't we go with commenting out the 401 error document, and include
> the patch in the release notes?

++1

We've got to get this out to more people and replace 2.0.16/18. Beta
testers can deal with Release Notes and Bug databases quite well.

There will be more bugs. What makes this a beta right now is that it
is obviously an improvement over the prior beta.

-aaron (who thinks we should release betas more often)