Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 1072 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2001 18:36:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 1061 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2001 18:36:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:36:33 -0800 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: httpd 2.0.27 tarballs are available - Install Errors Message-ID: <20011106103633.N11988@ebuilt.com> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <20011105185633.M11988@ebuilt.com> <3BE828F5.DA4EBAD3@remulak.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BE828F5.DA4EBAD3@remulak.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 01:16:21PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote: > Actually, I rolled on my laptop so I wouldn't have to store my gpg > private key on daedalus. But it's the same story - libtool 1.3.5. I'll > go hunt for a newer libtool rpm, if it helps with HP-UX. libtool 1.4.2 should also allow Darwin to build statically. I doubt that we can have DSO support on OS 10.1 in a reasonable time, so I'd feel that it's okay to have that broken for a beta. > Any idea why PHP doesn't like 1.4.2? I think there is some conflict with libtool 1.4.2 and autoconf 2.52. IIRC, when I tried to use libtool 1.4.2 with PHP, it gave me an error about that combination. But, I think libtool 1.4.2 and autoconf 2.13 should be fine. -- justin