Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 59175 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2001 20:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 59154 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2001 20:43:29 -0000 Message-ID: <032b01c1695f$2f4a90b0$93c0b0d0@v505> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: References: Subject: Re: [2.0] lstat's in spite of AllowOverride None Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:39:12 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2001 20:43:27.0931 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F4A90B0:01C1695F] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Dirk, would you run this benchmark again against cvs HEAD so we can see the impact of the 'one stat dir_walk' patch introduced today? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dirk-Willem van Gulik" To: Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:31 PM Subject: Re: [2.0] lstat's in spite of AllowOverride None > > For those who, like me, are a bit nummerically challenges; see attached > graph of the same data (I hope). > > Martin - if you want to - I've got some automated graphing set up from > an earlier profiling thing we did. If you want we could do some automation > in this area. > > Dw >