httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GOMEZ Henri <hgo...@slib.fr>
Subject RE: Apache 2.0.27 and 2.0.28 RPM available
Date Sat, 24 Nov 2001 09:00:29 GMT
Thank,

I just sent logs to you, JF and Pier :)

Feel free to forward to the list. Nota that
I'm running Redhat 7.2 where a libtool > 1.4
is installed

-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com]
>Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 9:58 AM
>To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.27 and 2.0.28 RPM available
>
>
>On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 09:44:56AM +0100, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>> Yes, if you take a look a tomcat-dev for JTC, you'll see 
>that I couldn't
>> build mod_webapp for Apache 2.0 with Apache 2.0 libtool, but I could
>> with GNU libtool. I could send you many logs of 
>mod_jk/mod_webapp built
>> with system libtool and apache 2.0 generated libtool. Also I 
>could attach
>> the generated libtool.
>
>Eh?  Sure.  Just send the logs.  Out of curiousity, try downloading
>the OS/X-specific distribution of httpd-2.0.28 as we built that one
>with libtool-1.4.2 (there is no other difference).  Madhu reported
>that newer versions of libtool don't work on HP-UX.  If the version
>that we are including (1.3.4-freebsd-ports) is more trouble than it
>is worth, we can reverse it by building HP-UX-specific tarballs
>instead (with 1.3.4-freebsd-ports) and use 1.4.2+ for everyone else.
>That'd be my preference if I were RM anyway.
>
>> With that patch, I could make web_app start compiling on a system
>> where apr is not installed under $prefix. I strongly believe in APR
>> and I saw not reason why we should have APR installed alone on 
>> system, and to follow FHS it should live under /usr/lib/libapr* and
>> /usr/include/apr/apr_*.h. Dito for Expat...
>
>What you want here is not apr-include or apr-lib, I think what you
>really want is the option to point httpd-2.0 at precompiled APR
>and Expat.  For Expat, that option is already there (but may not
>be the default - check in apr-util for the exact option).  For APR, 
>we probably don't want to do this until we have release APR on its 
>own.  But, I guess we could throw it in there as an option.
>Thoughts?
>
>> Nice, does it means that I won't have to also add my defines in
>> ap_config.h ?
>
>Should be.  -- justin
>

Mime
View raw message