Brian Pane wrote:
> 3. Keep using apr_table_t for the fields in request_rec, and redesign
> the internals of apr_table_t to support O(log(n)) access
> Pros:
> * Performance improvement for the httpd
> * Almost no impact on code that uses APR
> Cons:
> * Changes required to code that uses apr_table_elts() (on the order
> of half a dozen calls in Apache 2.0, and occasional usage in the
> handful of large 3rd-party modules that I've checked)
>
>
> Comments?
This seems the best way to go. Perhaps apr_table_elts should be replaced
by a set of iterators, like apr_hash_first/next?
--
Brane Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
|