httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <>
Subject Re: worker mpm: can we optimize away the listener thread?
Date Thu, 29 Nov 2001 17:48:29 GMT
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:31:01AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:20 am, Brian Pane wrote:
> > So...please forgive me if this has already been considered and dismissed
> > a long time ago, but...why can't the listener and worker be the same
> > thread?
> That's where we were before worker, with the threaded MPM.  There are
> thread management issues with that model, and it doesn't scale as well.

Not exactly, in Brian's model we still have the benefit of only having
one thread per process in the accept loop at one time, which means
significantly reduced overhead from lock contention (remember my posts
a few months back about how terrible fcntl() gets when there are even
more than just a few threads/processes contending for the lock?).

Thread mangement (at shutdown) has always been a problem in our threaded
MPMs. I'm still not completely comfortable with the current state of
worker, but that has more to do with signals than threads.


View raw message