httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Bloom <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: FW: mod_include vs file descriptors
Date Thu, 15 Nov 2001 05:21:32 GMT
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 10:58 pm, Brian Pane wrote:
> Cliff Woolley < mailto:cliffwoolley@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > We are talking about destroying the sub request.  By the time this is
> > > done, we have already passed all of the data from the sub-requests
> > > filter stack to the original requests.  Either all of the data was
> > > written to the network, or it was set-aside.  If it was written to the
> > > network, we can ignore it.  If it was set aside, then it was done so
> > > in the original request, so we passed r->pool or c->pool to the
> > > setaside function.
> >
> > [thinks for a minute] Yeah, that does sound right.  Bottom line is that
> > core_output_filter is (or should be) taking care of all this for us.
> > Okay, +1.
>
> Here's a patch that destroys the subrequest

Finally got around to committing this, just now.  :-)

Ryan

______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom				rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies			rbb@covalent.net
--------------------------------------------------------------

Mime
View raw message