httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Bloom <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: not in CVS? (was: Re: 2.0.28-beta release?)
Date Tue, 13 Nov 2001 23:51:22 GMT
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 03:49 pm, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:08:09PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
> >...
> > As it turns out, the docs/conf/httpd-*.conf files also have post-tag
> > changes.  So changing/re-tagging them in cvs would be as complex as
> > changing the code.
>
> WHAT? Are you saying that I cannot produce the 2.0.28 tarball from CVS?
>
> That isn't right.

I would go even farther.  That is completely bogus, and if it is true, then
2.0.28 must be dropped.  This is why we shouldn't be making so many changes
to a tag.  Either the tag lives or dies once it has been laid.  Small changes,
fine.  But we added like four or five bug fixes to 2.0.28.

Ryan

______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom				rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies			rbb@covalent.net
--------------------------------------------------------------

Mime
View raw message