httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Bloom <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: 2.0.28-beta release?
Date Tue, 13 Nov 2001 20:00:31 GMT
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 11:28 am, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Greg Ames" <gregames@remulak.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:56 PM
>
> > Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > I know that we can't touch the 2.0.28-alpha tarball, but I seem
> > > to recall someone saying we could touch the next-level tarball
> > > (i.e. -beta).
> >
> > hmmmm...that's an interesting idea.  I like it!  I would bump the tag on
> > that file, do the PITA dance with the CHANGES file, probably do a little
> > testing, re-roll, rename the tarballs as beta.  What do others think?  I
> > could note that this happened in the CHANGES file since I have to mess
> > with it anyway.
>
> I'd suggest that you checkout on APACHE-2_0_28, tag as APACHE-2_0_28_ALPHA
> for historical reasons, then we can add APACHE-2_0_28_BETA, etc.

No, there is 2.0.28, period.  There isn't a 2.0.28-alpha and 2.0.28-beta
code base.  There is one 2.0.28 codebase.  You could have different versions
if the alpha/beta distinction was in the code, but it isn't.  It is only in the tarball
name.

Ryan

______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom				rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies			rbb@covalent.net
--------------------------------------------------------------

Mime
View raw message