httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <>
Subject Re: 2.0.28-beta release?
Date Wed, 14 Nov 2001 02:36:28 GMT
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:27:27PM -0500, Padwa, Daniel wrote:
> If 2.0.28 is good for beta except for a few files, why not just check out
> 2.0.28, update the files you want, and then re-roll that as 2.0.29?   Branch
> if necessary to get only the changes you want.
> The whole versioning scheme as currently spec'd doesn't really make sense if
> you can't do that.   Does a re-roll require pulling all files at HEAD?

For the simple reason that we need all tarballs to be tagged in CVS,
so we can regenerate/replicate them later if need be.

> That said - I'd cast my (not-counted) vote for just making 2.0.28 beta.
> Maybe to be followed up by another beta before year-end?   Pretty please?

I think that 2.0.28 is a big milestone for 2.0, so hopefully from now on
we'll be able to release betas more often.


View raw message