httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <i...@cnet.com>
Subject Re: can somebody remind me why the threaded.c MPM is still around?
Date Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:38:22 GMT
On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 08:31, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 08:11:10AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:07:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > > (the subject says it all)
> > 
> > We just need to decide if the worker MPM is to become the primary
> > hybrid threaded/process MPM, no?
> 
> +1 for removing threaded MPM.
> +1 for activating worker MPM as the default when we have threads.
> +1 for renaming all of the MPMs to actually make some damn sense.
> 
+1 x 3
is there a platform that worker doesn't work and threads does?

> > [Doesn't this discussion belong on dev@httpd?]
> 
> Yes.  -- justin
-- 
Ian Holsman          IanH@cnet.com
Performance Measurement & Analysis
CNET Networks   -   (415) 344-2608


Mime
View raw message