httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: 2_0_28 tarballs rolled and available
Date Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:46:55 GMT
Just chatted with Greg (his key is now signed on pgp.mit.edu), and I've renamed 
the  following to better get along with our mime-typing:

httpd-2_0_28-alpha.tar.gz.darwin[.asc] -> httpd-2_0_28-alpha-darwin.tar.gz[.asc]

Both Greg and I are curious, will OS X users really grok their build is darwin,
or will we need lots of colorful notes?  Or, do we choose a different name?


I've just moved up:

httpd-2_0_28-alpha-win32.zip[.asc]

includes the .rc and .mak file intermediates for the Win32 build schema.


We need clearer docs in HEADER.html about source code 'flavors' at /dist/httpd/ 
before moving these to beta, to spare us the inevitable question, "Where are the
binarys???"

Bill


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Ames" <gregames@remulak.net>
To: "httpd" <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:19 PM
Subject: 2_0_28 tarballs rolled and available


> ...in http://dev.apache.org/dist/ .  Please download, test, and vote for
> beta.
> 
> I made separate tarballs available for Mac OS X.  Tarballs rolled with
> daedalus's libtool do not work on Darwin, so I used libtool 1.4.2 for
> that one.  I used daedalus's libtool 1.4.2 for the others, which works
> on HP-UX.  I stuck a READ-ME.Darwin file in the directory so hopefully
> Mac OS X users can figure it out.
> 
> Thanks to Chuck M., Madhu, and Cliff for testing preliminary tarballs,
> and to OtherBill and Justin for taking care of serious issues after the
> original tag.
> 
> Greg
> 


Mime
View raw message