httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: 2.0.29? (Re: apparent mod_cgid bug Re: Two apache/2.0.29-devproblems)
Date Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:07:26 GMT
> Cliff Woolley wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >
> > > Dale, please let me know if this fixes it.  If so, we may want to
> > > bump the tag on this file for 2.0.28.  -- justin
> >
> > We're rapidly approaching the point in time where it would be better to
> > start on 2.0.29 than to keep bumping tags on 2.0.28 -- I don't know about
> > you all, but I'm starting to lose track of what changes have been tagged
> > in since the original 2.0.28 and which ones haven't.
>
> Basically, 2.0.28 has got OtherBill's fix to request.c to reduce the
> number of stats, plus some minor stuff, on top of the original tag.  I
> would like to push Justin's mod_cgid fix into 2.0.28, re-roll, then make
> the tarballs public, and vote for beta.  This won't even need additional
> testing on daedalus, because daedalus uses mod_cgi.
>
> Why not just start over?  Because then we pick up whatever brokenness
> has crept into CVS in the mean time.  Bill S. says Win32 won't build at
> the moment with current HEAD.
>

My bad. Win32 is building fine. I accidently hosed awk on my machine which causes all
sorts of weird build problems.

I am for bumping the mod_cgid changes and rolling 2.0.28. We can make the tarball
available today for voting on beta.

Bill



Mime
View raw message