Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 15002 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2001 11:15:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14990 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2001 11:15:29 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rdu88-250-106.nc.rr.com: trawick set sender to trawick@attglobal.net using -f Sender: trawick@rdu88-250-106.nc.rr.com To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: DSO References: <1002464883000020@lycos.co.uk> <20011007083116.Z13476@clove.org> <20011008202124.H21545@ebuilt.com> From: Jeff Trawick Date: 09 Oct 2001 07:15:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20011008202124.H21545@ebuilt.com> Message-ID: Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Justin Erenkrantz writes: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 08:31:16AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > I propose we simply get rid of the "if test" in the above code snippit, > > and default to "static" for mod_so, since by default we have some > > modules already turned on. Alternatively we could default to "no" > > and simply set "enable_so=yes" as soon as any APACHE_MODULE call ends > > in something non-"no". > > Well, I'm kind of thinking we should always build mod_so. I've run > into the case where I haven't built any shared core libraries (i.e. > in the tree), but have wanted to install a "separate" module (i.e. > mod_webapp) which must be built as shared. Since I didn't compile > in mod_so, I needed to do a full recompile to enable mod_so. Yuck. It sounds reasonable to me to build mod_so by default, but I think that the builder should be able to turn off mod_so. Somebody putting together a package for distribution/support ought to be able to decide what modules they are willing to deal with, and mod_so opens up everything. I doubt that a commercial vendor would make such a decision, but certainly within an organization it might make sense. I bet a lot of companies would like a build of IIS to put on their employees' machines which could not be made to do anything other than serve static pages :) -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien...