Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 69253 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2001 00:45:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 69242 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2001 00:45:41 -0000 Message-ID: From: "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" To: "'dev@httpd.apache.org'" Subject: RE: SSL configuration file Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 17:45:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yes.. exactly.. but is it not required that the httpd-ssl.conf in the CVS ?.. Where else would the user get the httpd-ssl.conf from ?.. -Madhu -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:rbb@covalent.net] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:10 PM To: dev@httpd.apache.org; William A. Rowe, Jr. Subject: Re: SSL configuration file On Monday 01 October 2001 03:01 pm, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Exactly. :-) Ryan > > Include conf/httpd-ssl.conf > > > Bill > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:56 PM > Subject: RE: SSL configuration file > > > Quick related question : should I send the default httpd-ssl.conf, or can > > somebody check in a default one into CVS. > > Also, in the default httpd-ssl.conf, the ServerRoot should be > > "@@ServerRoot@@" - as in httpd-std.conf, and will have to be modified > > during the "make install" stage (only if SSL is enabled), and the > > "include conf/httpd-ssl.conf" be enabled in httpd.conf ?.. > > > > Thx > > -Madhu > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:Ken.Coar@Golux.Com] > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:53 PM > > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > > Subject: Re: SSL configuration file > > > > Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > The reality is that most people just use the default > > > config, and modify it to fit their needs. > > > > I think that actually the reality is that most people > > get a massaged config as part of their OS distribution, > > which probably bears only a nodding resemblance to our > > file. The distribution builders have a long history of > > mashing the tar out of our defaults. :-) > > > > I'm with Ryan here -- I think it should be a separate > > file. > > -- > > #ken P-)} > > > > Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ > > Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ > > > > "All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!" -- ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net --------------------------------------------------------------