Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 1915 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2001 03:47:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 1904 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2001 03:47:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:47:22 -0700 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 Makefile.in Message-ID: <20011004204722.W21545@ebuilt.com> References: <20011005032756.10628.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <00b101c14d50$110be840$93c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00b101c14d50$110be840$93c0b0d0@roweclan.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:40:20PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Make sure we run the new conf files through sed. > > Now, the question is whether it might make more sense to have them > > as ssl-std.conf, ldap-std.conf, and proxy-std.conf. > > > > (I'm also not sure if this is even shell portable or not.) > > > > I'll leave that up to OtherBill since he added these files. > > As the input source? Sure. I'll rename in just a bit if you want > to twiddle the script. Actually, it'd copy it as ssl-std.conf. I dunno if that is what we want or not. Do we want them to have an original like httpd-std.conf? No biggie. -- justin