httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <cliffwool...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:56:59 GMT
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> >   -    2.0.26  : tagged October 16th, 2001.
> >   +    2.0.27  : tagged October 30th, 2001.
> >   +    2.0.26  : tagged October 16th, 2001.  not rolled.
> >        2.0.25  : rolled August 29, 2001
> >        2.0.24  : rolled August 18, 2001
> >        2.0.23  : rolled August 9, 2001
>
> IMHO, it seems to be appropriate to note that we never rolled 2.0.26.
> Should we update STATUS as part of the tagging process or only when
> rolling a tarball?  But, if like 2.0.26, we tag but not roll, what
> do we say?  I don't care what it says as long as it indicates that
> 2.0.26 was never rolled...

As an aside, it doesn't much matter when these changes get made (ie,
whether before or after the tag and before or after the roll), since
STATUS is not distributed with the tarball.

--Cliff

--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA



Mime
View raw message