httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: .asis handler isn't driven
Date Tue, 02 Oct 2001 21:08:38 GMT
This is one of those 'light bulb comes on' posts.

The mod_mime bug of not correctly handling unknown file name extensions essentially
renders all the negotiable variants equivalent! mod_negotiation does the right thing and
serves up the smallest of the equivalent variants!

Bill

> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:02:46AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:01:54PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > > IMHO, if we have unpredictable behavior due to directory -contents-,
> > > then mod_negotiation is broken.
>
> There was nothing unpredictable about it before.
>
> > +1 (me too).
> >
> > Although I have no clue what the proper solution to this, I'm kind
> > of sure that if we are choosing based off file size, that is wrong.
> > There is no correlation between file size and actual content size
> > (think of a php-file versus a static file).  The only thing I could
> > think of is a preference directive like so:
>
> The original purpose of content negotiation was to select the highest
> quality and smallest transfer size image that a browser supports for
> an in-line image.  Size does matter.
>
> > Prefer html shtml php jsp cgi
>
> We don't need another config directive.  All of these used to be special
> mime types, but somebody decided it was better to define them as handlers.
> Well, all we have to do then is add them to the mime type table (or as
> a separate table) and score them higher in negotiation.
>
> ....Roy
>


Mime
View raw message