Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 25220 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2001 21:03:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 25209 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2001 21:03:21 -0000 From: "Sander Striker" To: Subject: RE: Tag time? Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:04:05 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3BA51220.6010302@pacbell.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Brian Pane [mailto:bpane@pacbell.net] > Sent: 16 September 2001 22:57 > Ryan Bloom wrote: > > >On Sunday 16 September 2001 01:34 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > >Yes, the code isn't ready. There is at least one seg fault that we > >already know about. > > > Is that the dir-merge segv with mod_ssl, or something different? Well, there is at least the dir-merge segv which is more generic than just mod_ssl. Doug posted a minimal repro recipe a few days back. Sander