Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50524 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2001 15:29:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50513 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2001 15:29:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ryan Bloom Reply-To: rbb@covalent.net Organization: Covalent Technologies To: dev@httpd.apache.org, Justin Erenkrantz Subject: Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 08:28:24 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <20010908040820.973FB46DF4@koj.rkbloom.net> <20010908013319.M2482@ebuilt.com> In-Reply-To: <20010908013319.M2482@ebuilt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20010908152825.0B16146DF4@koj.rkbloom.net> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Saturday 08 September 2001 01:33, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 09:08:20PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > I also do not believe that we should be making this decision right now. > > I am 100% in agreement with Jim about this. We should table this whole > > discussion until emotions have calmed, the patent issue has been finally > > resolved (Dirk told me today that he knows of two patents, and he would > > post about them), and Apache 2.0 has shipped. > > On the zlib main site (http://www.gzip.org/zlib/): > > zlib is designed to be a free, general-purpose, legally unencumbered -- > that is, not covered by any patents -- lossless data-compression library > for use on virtually any computer hardware and operating system. > > Not to say that they may not be wrong, but their view seems to be > that zlib and its algortihms aren't covered by any compression > patents. I don't know if this helps at all. -- justin Compression isn't the only place that patents can happen that would affect this. The patents that Dirk mentioned to me, were for serving content that was dynamically compressed. As I said though, I haven't actually read the patents yet, because I don't have their numbers. Dirk said he had posted them, but I can't find it in my mailbox, so I am assuming I deleted it. He promised to re-post. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net --------------------------------------------------------------