Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 67554 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2001 16:27:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 67541 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 16:27:14 -0000 From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200109071627.MAA27200@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:27:05 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: from "Ben Hyde" at Sep 07, 2001 10:18:52 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ben Hyde wrote: > > To repeat all these inform the debate, they are a list > of things to think about, but we don't have and don't > want some objective scoring scheme for these; the > public debate process while tedious is good - particularly > when we all remain gentlemenly. > Here here. My intent was not scoring, but rather, as you said, an honest *discussion* of the module, and some topics that should be discussed about it. I just don't want us to not do What's Right in this case simply because of the emotions that the debate caused. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither"