Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36625 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2001 18:00:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36605 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2001 18:00:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ryan Bloom Reply-To: rbb@covalent.net Organization: Covalent Technologies To: dev@httpd.apache.org, Graham Leggett Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:00:31 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <20010906150401.94347.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <3B97AAC3.1C9867B6@sharp.fm> In-Reply-To: <3B97AAC3.1C9867B6@sharp.fm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20010906180031.BB81146DF4@koj.rkbloom.net> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:56, Graham Leggett wrote: Just ran a few tests with OtherBill. IIS 5.0's default behavior, at least, is not to gzip an html file. We already support gzip encoding today. This discussion is about on-the-fly gzip compression. Ryan > rbb@apache.org wrote: > > I am veto'ing this, for now at least. I will support making mod_gz > > a separate sub-project of httpd, and possibly rolling it into a later > > release of 2.0, but now is not the time to do this. > > A separate subproject for something as small as this module sounds a > little extreme. I just checked today - IIS v5.0 supports gzip content > encoding, people out there will be expecting apache to be able to do it > too - without installing anything extra. > > Regards, > Graham -- ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net --------------------------------------------------------------