Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 92150 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2001 18:38:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 92132 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2001 18:38:49 -0000 Message-ID: <01d901c13703$3d008b80$13381b09@sashimi> From: "Bill Stoddard" To: References: <20010906150401.94347.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <20010906115350.B11415@Lithium.MeepZor.Com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 14:39:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 on the veto :-) I am a strong +1 in favor of making this a subproject and probably rolling it into a post 2.0 release. The presence of mod_gz in the core now -will- impact folks who are working on stabilizing the server. Bill > * On 2001-09-06 at 11:51, > rbb@apache.org excited the electrons to say: > > > > I am veto'ing this, for now at least. I will support making mod_gz > > a separate sub-project of httpd, and possibly rolling it into a later > > release of 2.0, but now is not the time to do this. > > Vetos need a valid technical justification, not just an opinion.. > -- > #ken P-)} > > Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ > Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ > > "All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!" >