httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Leggett <>
Subject Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:36:01 GMT
Chuck Murcko wrote:

> -1 for A,B,C as currently proposed. Frankly, we've voted to put the proxy
> back twice. Why are we having this vote again? The last reason I heard for
> not putting the proxy back in was "we're worried about HTTP proxy standard
> diverging". It sounds thin.

This isn't a vote about putting the proxy back in - it's a vote of how
the final release of apache will look like.

It's important that this be nailed down first so that we have a "how to
release" plan for the various projects involved. It may well be that
everything ends up in the httpd-2.0 tree at the end of the day, but we
won't be able to decide that if we don't know how we are going to
release apache to the public.

-----------------------------------------		"There's a moon
					over Bourbon Street
View raw message