httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Bloom <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2001 03:59:38 GMT
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 08:56 pm, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:53:47PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > Why is calling it proc_pthread silly?  We are talking about a pthread
> > > based process lock.  Personally, I think Apache 1.3 should be changed,
> > > especially since it hasn't been released yet.  My concern is that
> > > calling it a pthread lock makes it sound like we are just locking
> > > threads.
> >
> > Fine, change one or the other.  Having it inconsistent is *silly*.
> > Personally, I think Apache 1.3's pthread makes more sense given the
> > context.  -- justin
>
> I agree with Justin.

That's fine, could you please explain why?  I am trying to understand this
POV.  Why don't you think that calling out the proc part is important?
I don't mind being wrong, but I do mind not knowing why I am wrong.  :-)

Ryan

______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom				rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies			rbb@covalent.net
--------------------------------------------------------------

Mime
View raw message