httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <>
Subject Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format - Score So Far...
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:35:36 GMT
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 04:32:12PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Graham Leggett []
> > The winner seems to be that the Apache group releases a rollup release
> > with all (at least apr, apr-util, httpd-2.0, httpd-proxy, httpd-ldap)
> > the projects included, and that release is called "apache-2.x.x.tar.gz".
> > Am I right on this one?
> I have no problem with that (although it seems that the only difference
> between this and what the group has always done is that everything lives in
> different cvs repositories).

Seems that way. We can have multiple CVS repositories and then make
decisions on which ones go into the rollup.

For example, we could include mod_proxy and mod_ldap repositories, but
exclude the mod_pop3 repository. And on into the future...

> But I think we also have concensus that the name shouldn't be "apache".
> "apache-httpd-2.x.x.tar.gz" seems better.


I am +0 on httpd-2... and +1 on apache-httpd-2...

btw, no dates in those either (a suggestion from otherbill). The version
number tells us what we need to know.


Greg Stein,

View raw message