httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Bloom <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format
Date Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:43:02 GMT
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 04:35 pm, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > o Option A: apache-2.x.x.tar.gz
> > >
> > >   Combines httpd-2.0, apr, apr-util, httpd-proxy and
> > >   httpd-ldap and produces an apache rollup tree.
> >
> > +1 on Option A.  I think that anything else is going to be too
> > confusing for end users.
>
> I also prefer option A.  My only question is do we really want to start
> making a distinction between "apache" and "httpd"?  I don't think we do.
> How about apache-bundle-2.x.x.tar.gz ?

Regardless of how we do the roll-up, nont of our builds should have the
word Apache in them.  The httpd project is the httpd project.  If we use the
word Apache, then we are co-opting the Foundation's name, instead of
the project name.

Ryan

______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom				rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies			rbb@covalent.net
--------------------------------------------------------------

Mime
View raw message