Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Sender: trawick@rdu26-58-158.nc.rr.com
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: GTest in watchdog fails with Apache...]
References: <20010806083522.H26315@ebuilt.com>
	<B794836E.D18A%pier@betaversion.org>
	<20010806095733.N26315@ebuilt.com>
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@attglobal.net>
Date: 07 Aug 2001 09:28:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20010806095733.N26315@ebuilt.com>
Message-ID: <m3n15cq9sh.fsf@rdu26-58-158.nc.rr.com>
Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Status: O

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com> writes:


> Of course, I could be misunderstanding it all.  But, the chances of
> httpd's HTTP parser being incorrect w.r.t. the spec or the intent of 
> the authors is very very slim.  FWIW, IIS and iPlanet both behave 
> identically to Apache (try out microsoft.com and netscape.com).

except when you send a pre-1.0 request, where Apache's response seems
to make more sense than IIS or iPlanet
-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
       http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
             Born in Roswell... married an alien...