Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73117 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2001 00:30:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73100 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2001 00:30:26 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU: jcw5q owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:30:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: 2.0.26?] In-Reply-To: <999217003.830.12.camel@c1619481-a.almda1.sfba.home.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1697 On 30 Aug 2001, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > There is probably another weeks worth of work in optimizing these > > > modules (see the ap_location_walk function for such an example.) > > > Then all these code paths can be folded into a single place. > > > > The other option is that we patch these to a single code path > > _today_. Let Apache run a bit slow until these optimizations are > > moved into the right, magic places. > > > I think that would make more sense. +1 --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley cliffwoolley@yahoo.com Charlottesville, VA