Return-Path: 
 <new-httpd-return-18703-apmail-new-httpd-archive=apache.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 1222 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2001 20:56:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
list-help: <mailto:new-httpd-help@apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:new-httpd-unsubscribe@apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:new-httpd@apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org
Received: (qmail 1204 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2001 20:56:13 -0000
X-Authentication-Warning: cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU: jcw5q owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:56:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Cliff Woolley <cliffwoolley@yahoo.com>
X-X-Sender: <jcw5q@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
cc: <tokiley@aol.com>
Subject: Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up
In-Reply-To: <94.182cf639.28a5a117@aol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.32.0108101652320.8780-100000@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords: 
X-UID: 460

On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 TOKILEY@aol.com wrote:

> Before anyone scoots that tarball out to a beta or GA dir I am
> just trying to verify it has a chance of downloading/building
> and so far I can't.

Nothing's going anywhere until we have a working Win32 tarball, believe
me.

> BTW: This release has all the 'ApacheMonitor' TRAY ICON code
> already in it but if you break that code out and manually 'load' it
> up into a blank project space to build 'stand-alone' it won't compile
> so not sure what's up with all that, either. I don't even remember
> anyone even VOTING on this ApacheMonitor code and now it's
> already in the distribution? Seems like the code submission/verification
> committ process short-circuited on this one or something.

Apache 2.0 is commit then review.  Besides, this is just a little
support application.  There was no need for a vote.

> I am not saying it won't work or that it isn't what Wrowe wanted...
> it just seems weird how it has 'slipped' into the distribution and
> doesn't even seem to compile yet. I didn't know it was that easy
> to get code into an Apache distribution.

By all (other) reports I've heard, it compiles and works.  I don't know
why you're having problems compiling it, but I have to assume they're the
same problems you're having with the rest of the tarball.

<shrug>

--Cliff


--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA