Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 84068 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2001 01:23:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 84057 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2001 01:23:15 -0000 Message-ID: From: "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" To: "'new-httpd@apache.org'" Subject: RE: are we ready to roll? - POST thru' mod_ssl Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 21:22:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 374 Another observation : shouldn't we ought to be checking the return value of apr_brigade_partition (line 682, http_protocol.c) Thanks -Madhu -----Original Message----- From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:madhusudan_mathihalli@hp.com] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 6:09 PM To: 'new-httpd@apache.org' Subject: RE: are we ready to roll? - POST thru' mod_ssl Hi, Some thoughts towards resolving the issue : -> Observation 1 : http_protocol.c @ line 683 => should we not check the return value of apr_brigade_length().. -> Observation 2 : http_protocol.c @ line 684 => During a SSL connection, the value of total is some huge negative number (-2145909483).. I'm not sure what that number is, but I'm certainly not comfortable with that number.. Incase of a http connection, the value is equal to *readbytes.. -> Observation 3 : if we replace lines 680 - 684 of http_protocol.c, with the old logic, the POST seems to work for SSL connections also.. Thanks -Madhu -----Original Message----- From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:dougm@covalent.net] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 5:51 PM To: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) Subject: RE: are we ready to roll? On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > Doug, > Is a simple POST operation through a SSL connection working ?.. It's failing > for me.. no, its not working since the changes rbb made to ap_http_filter yesterday. he's aware of the problem, but was out of the office today. i'm going to make sure it gets fixed by tommorrow.