Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46246 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2001 18:06:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46231 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 18:06:21 -0000 Subject: Re: time for 2.0.25? From: Ian Holsman To: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20010829102811.M17570@ebuilt.com> References: <999102313.22391.17.camel@griffon.cnet.com> <20010829102811.M17570@ebuilt.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99+cvs.2001.08.21.23.41 (Preview Release) Date: 29 Aug 2001 11:05:56 -0700 Message-Id: <999108356.22394.42.camel@griffon.cnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1522 On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 10:28, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:25:13AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: > > apache.org seems to have been running .24 (+mod_include fix) > > for a while now (>3days). > > > > How about we Tag&Roll .25 put it up on apache.org and if all goes > > well monday will be beta2 day. > > +1 for tagging what we have now. I'm not aware of anything currently > broken, but I would like to perform some sanity tests before we roll. > -- justin the only thing broken is berkleyDBM support (but that has been broken for a long long time, and should hold us up) -- Ian Holsman IanH@cnet.com Performance Measurement & Analysis CNET Networks - (415) 364-8608