Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Message-Id: <200108130525.f7D5PMB14548@silk.apana.org.au>
From: "Brian Havard" <brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au>
To: "new-httpd@apache.org" <new-httpd@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:25:21 +1000 (EST)
Reply-To: "Brian Havard" <brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au>
Priority: Normal
In-Reply-To: <0108091720590B.09485@koj.rkbloom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: configuration directives for spmt_os2
Status: O

On Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:20:59 -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:

>Sorry, didn't mean to send this to the list.  When I said it was messed up,
>I meant the OS/2 MPM wasn't like the rest of them.  My general feeling
>is that if the OS/2 or Windows MPMs don't make sense, leave them alone, 
>and let the developers who understand them do any work on them
>later.

Fair enough. It is actually quite a mess due to the fact that it was a
quick hack port of prefork with threads substituted for processes. I'm
currently working on an mpmt MPM for OS/2 that will replace it, written
from scratch. It currently runs & serves requests but still needs some work
to be complete.

I'd like to call it mpmt_os2 but MPM naming seems to have moved away from
that convention (which I prefered). Do we have an MPM naming convension or
is it just whatever the author feels like?

-- 
 ______________________________________________________________________________
 |  Brian Havard                 |  "He is not the messiah!                   |
 |  brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au  |  He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------