Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 58582 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2001 05:05:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 58562 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 05:05:46 -0000 Errors-To: Message-ID: <033f01c12935$63839da0$95c0b0d0@roweclan.net> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: , References: <20010819005402.49795.qmail@icarus.apache.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/docroot/error/images - New directory Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 00:02:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 843 If we take a close look at Roy's new schema, and the intent of this page, and how Icons and other server-wide stuff is installed, I think these aught to reside in httpd-2.0/docs/error/ They aught to be installed to @@serverroot@@/error/ But because I'm building a 'composite negotation typemap/content' method, where the new sytnax will be; Content-mechanism: values Body:end-tag

This is actual content

end-tag I'm suggesting we leave the contribution where it is, and build these composite-ed type-map/content files right into httpd-2.0/docs/error/. Would this be acceptable to everyone? Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 7:54 PM Subject: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/docroot/error/images - New directory > lars 01/08/18 17:54:02 > > httpd-2.0/docs/docroot/error/images - New directory >