Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Errors-To: <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Message-ID: <01e301c124fd$015666d0$96c0b0d0@roweclan.net>
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
References: <20010814194254.58768.qmail@icarus.apache.org>
 <00a701c124fc$22120790$c6431b09@sashimi>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/winnt mpm_winnt.c
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 15:03:09 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: O

From: "Bill Stoddard" <stoddard@raleigh.ibm.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/winnt mpm_winnt.c


> > wrowe       01/08/14 12:42:54
> >
> >   Modified:    server/mpm/winnt mpm_winnt.c
> >   Log:
> >     Outch to Win9x... can't be destroying locks asymetrically.  Do we want
> >     this lock on NT as well?  That's another question
> 
> yes, we definitely need qlock on NT.  We do not need jobmutex on NT though. There is a
> fair amount of this kind of cleanup needed in the windows mpm that has been on my todo
> list forever.  It is not broken, just not as clean as it could be.

s/on NT /on Win9x /

my bad, sorry.  Of course we already do it for NT/W2k.  It's simply disabled on 9x.

Bill