Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29036 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2001 19:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29025 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 19:04:37 -0000 Message-ID: <015501c12c06$8154aa80$0b381b09@sashimi> From: "Bill Stoddard" To: References: Subject: Re: 2.0.24 ready for beta? Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:04:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1127 > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > I'm -1 on calling any Win32 release a beta without those eliminated > > > > I'm okay with only declaring beta on Unix/Linux. > > I don't think I am. Let's get this taken care of. :-/ > Why? Most serious Apache users run Unix/Linux. And thread support under Unix/Linux is one of the main features of Apache 2.0. Obviously we need to fix Win32 but it is wrong to delay the beta because of Win32. IMHO. Bill