Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Message-ID: <014001c130dd$484128a0$7f00a8c0@MITHRIL>
From: "David Reid" <dreid@jetnet.co.uk>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
References: <200108291809.OAA13161@devsys.jaguNET.com>
 <20010829121158.P17570@ebuilt.com>
 <999117742.22391.73.camel@griffon.cnet.com>
 <20010829205442.8D4004662A@koj.rkbloom.net> <20010829154740.J8750@lyra.org>
Subject: Re: time for 2.0.25?
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:52:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: O

The build is screwed on beos.  I'll try to look at it in the morning.

david

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Stein" <gstein@lyra.org>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>; <rbb@covalent.net>
Cc: "Ian Holsman" <ianh@cnet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: time for 2.0.25?


> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:54:42PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 August 2001 13:42, Ian Holsman wrote:
> >...
> > > Solaris 8/Sparc runs.
> > > but PROXY generates a core dump
> > > when i expand have a SSI tag printenv in it.
> >
> > Proxy is not currently a part of the Apache 2.0 dist, so I don't
consider
> > this seg fault a showstopper.  Although, when we roll mod_proxy into
> > 2.0.25, and thus tag mod_proxy, this should be fixed.
>
> Agreed.
>
> We should release 2.0.25 independently of mod_proxy. In fact, we could
> release 2.0.25 as a beta, and the combo as an alpha. Or we could get proxy
> to work against the tagged-25 and then release the combo as beta.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> --
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
>