Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 24694 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2001 13:42:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 24674 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2001 13:42:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ryan Bloom Reply-To: rbb@covalent.net Organization: Covalent Technologies To: new-httpd@apache.org, Cliff Woolley Subject: Re: 2.0.23 tarballs up Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 06:39:12 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0108100639120M.09485@koj.rkbloom.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 413 Okay, now its time for me to agitate things again. (I know, people are asking when I stopped agitating). :-) I want to go production. This server has more useful changes than just threads, and I don't believe that not having a threaded MPM should stop us from going into production. So, I believe I have seen at least three +1s for beta, and I will be number 4. +1 for beta. I'm starting a new trend. +1 for GA. Ryan On Friday 10 August 2001 00:32, Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:13:46AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > > The tarballs for 2.0.23 are up at http://dev.apache.org/dist/. Please > > > check them out... > > > > Compiles and runs on Linux 2.4. So, +1 for beta. > > > > I'll try to find time tomorrow to compile it on Solaris, but things are > > slightly out-of-kilter over here, so I doubt that will happen. > > It builds and runs fine on Solaris 2.6 (tested threaded MPM). The only > warnings are those stupid "function declaration is not a prototype" > messages that've been around for months that I can't figure out how to > fix, and they only appear in maintainer mode anyway, plus a single warning > that appears in both maintainer and regulard modes: "sockets.c:269: > warning: passing arg 2 of `connect' discards qualifiers from pointer > target type". That one's been around forever and a day also. No harm > done. > > It also concur that it builds fine under Linux 2.4 (RHL7.1), and same for > FreeBSD 4.3. The only warnings on either are the tmpnam() vs. mkstemp() > warnings for the htpasswd and htdigest support programs. I didn't try > running it on icarus, but it runs fine on my Linux box, plus it passes all > the mod_include tests from httpd-test, which I view as important since > mod_include utilizes so many features of the server. I tested both the > prefork and threaded MPMs. > > It even compiles and runs on Irix 6.5. =-) The only warnings (besides > harmless linker warnings I'm chalking up to the busted build environment > we have on our SGIs) were these: > threaded.c: In function `ap_mpm_run': > threaded.c:1216: warning: int format, pid_t arg (arg 4) > mod_status.c: In function `status_handler': > mod_status.c:492: warning: int format, long int arg (arg 3) > mod_status.c:572: warning: int format, pid_t arg (arg 5) > mod_status.c:649: warning: int format, pid_t arg (arg 5) > > And me with this pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side... > > > +1 for beta. > > --Cliff > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Cliff Woolley > cliffwoolley@yahoo.com > Charlottesville, VA -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net -----------------------------------------------------------------------------